Adviser conversation with laptop and meeting notes.

Solutions

Secure review for external advisers and service providers.

Boardmate gives external advisers and service providers a controlled way to review draft minutes, comment on the parts they know, and upload support where needed.

01 Access model

A private link can scope the reviewer to the draft and permitted support material.

02 Contribution

Comments, uploads, and no-comment confirmations stay attached to the meeting record.

03 Link control

Expiry, revocation, and audit history help board support explain who had access.

Workflow view

Review without a full workspace account

External reviewers can be invited to read the relevant draft and respond through a private route without becoming full workspace users.

  1. 01

    Access model: A private link can scope the reviewer to the draft and permitted support material.

  2. 02

    Contribution: Comments, uploads, and no-comment confirmations stay attached to the meeting record.

  3. 03

    Link control: Expiry, revocation, and audit history help board support explain who had access.

  4. 04

    Decision authority: Service provider input informs the draft, while chair or delegated control decides what changes.

Boardmate Lite review queue for draft minutes.
Draft minutes, reviewer activity, and comment decisions stay beside the reading surface.
Operating step Current process With Boardmate
01
Scope

Access matches the review task.

External comments can arrive through forwarded files, side emails or broad portal access that is heavier than the review needs.

Private links can scope review to the relevant draft, support material and permitted actions.

02
Input

Useful support stays attached.

A late report, correction or legal note can be separated from the draft version it was meant to support.

Uploads and comments remain tied to the meeting record and can be accepted, held or rejected before regeneration.

03
Close

Access and response status are clear.

The team may have to chase whether a provider opened the draft, had no comments or still owes a response.

Open activity, submissions, no-comment confirmations, expiry and revocation are part of the review history.

Boundary

Reviewers contribute without broad workspace exposure.

Trace

Comments, uploads and confirmations are attributable.

Decision

Provider input informs the draft only when accepted by the authorised owner.

See this workflow in Boardmate

Contents

01

Review without a full workspace account

External reviewers can be invited to read the relevant draft and respond through a private route without becoming full workspace users.

Legal reviewer

Comment on resolutions, defined terms, conflicts, wording sensitivity, and legal-review points.

Administrator

Check attendance, apologies, quorum, service provider reports, NAV or operational detail where relevant.

Compliance provider

Confirm annual-task status, policy review, training, filing support, or report wording where applicable.

02

Uploads stay tied to the review

Supporting files remain connected to the relevant draft and reviewer activity. Board support can see whether a response was a comment, a supporting upload, a no-comment confirmation, or an outstanding request.

  • Uploads are attached to the review route instead of disappearing into inbox threads.
  • Comments remain near the passages they relate to.
  • The chair or delegated owner can decide what should shape the next version.
03

Access has boundaries

Expiry, revocation, and audit history give board support teams a clearer control model for external review. The reviewer sees what they need for the task, while the wider workspace remains managed by the Boardmate user.

Scoped access

Private links support a focused review rather than a broad portal invitation.

Revocation

Access can be closed when the review window ends or the route changes.

Audit history

Open, comment, upload, confirmation, decision, regeneration, and export activity can remain visible to the workspace owner.

What to check

  1. Import CSV, recordings, transcripts, board packs, support notes, and separate report files where needed.
  2. Preflight the batch so gaps are visible before minutes are generated.
  3. Draft formal house-style minutes from the available source material.
  4. Request comments through private reviewer links and track confirmations.
  5. Chair or delegate accepts feedback before regeneration and approval.
  6. Export DOCX, PDF, action items, and an auditable record.

Reviewer workspace

Selected passages, reviewer comments, and chair decisions stay attached to the draft.

Draft minutes v2 Chair review

2. Prior minutes

The minutes of the meeting of the Board held on 17 June 2026 were tabled and reviewed. UPON MOTION DULY MADE, IT WAS RESOLVED that the minutes be approved subject to the agreed amendment.

The Board noted the continuing action on service provider reporting and requested that the updated timetable be circulated before the next meeting.

Common questions

Questions about this Boardmate workflow.

Does reviewer feedback automatically rewrite the minutes?

No. Reviewer comments are review input. The chair or delegated board support user decides which feedback shapes the next draft.

Can Boardmate be evaluated with a small sample batch?

Yes. A first evaluation usually works best with several ordinary meetings, one complex meeting, one short or adjourned meeting, and prior minutes that show house style.

Is Boardmate Lite separate from Boardmate Full?

Lite is the backlog-clearing workbench. Full is the broader board cycle workspace for agendas, report requests, board packs, annual compliance tasks, actions, approvals, reminders, and governance memory.